Skip to content

RANKING · EXPERTUNO SCORE · DOCUMENT SEARCH

Best agencies for AI document search (RAG) in Spain 2026: expertuno Score ranking

Short answer

The expertuno Score rates the 58 AI-specialist profiles that declare AI document search (RAG) from 0 to 100 with the same public formula: Google reputation (30 points), declared technology (15), complete profile (15), website and verification (15) and public proof (25). They are based in 26 Spanish cities and 36 have Google reviews. NextAI tops the list with 73.4 points.

Data as of 2 November 2026 · Sources: public Google Maps ratings and directory profiles · Methodology

Filter by city

Sort by:
  • Google reputation 30
  • Declared technology 15
  • Complete profile 15
  • Website and verification 15
  • Public proof 25

Top 25 of 58 profiles · Sorted by expertuno Score (0-100) · 36 profiles with reviews on Google

  1. Position 1
    NextAI

    NextAI

    SponsoredValencia5.0 out of 56 Google reviews

    AI agentsAutomationDocument search

    73.4/100

    View profile ↗ · NextAI
  2. Position 2
    INTERCONECTA

    INTERCONECTA

    Jumilla4.9 out of 523 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsConversational AI

    56.2/100

    View profile ↗ · INTERCONECTA
  3. Position 3
    Bolher Consulting

    Bolher Consulting

    Valencia5.0 out of 58 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsConversational AI

    55.2/100

    View profile ↗ · Bolher Consulting
  4. Position 4
    Inteligencia Artificial y Machine Learning

    Inteligencia Artificial y Machine Learning

    Barcelona4.9 out of 557 Google reviews

    AI agentsDocument searchAutomation

    54.6/100

    View profile ↗ · Inteligencia Artificial y Machine Learning
  5. Position 5
    Consultora de Software Dinacode

    Consultora de Software Dinacode

    Valencia4.8 out of 522 Google reviews

    AI agentsConversational AIDocument search

    53.3/100

    View profile ↗ · Consultora de Software Dinacode
  6. Position 6
    Chenai

    Chenai

    Valencia5.0 out of 51 Google reviews

    AutomationConversational AIDocument search

    52.7/100

    View profile ↗ · Chenai
  7. Position 7
    CRONUTS.DIGITAL

    CRONUTS.DIGITAL

    Barcelona4.5 out of 539 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsDocument search

    51.8/100

    View profile ↗ · CRONUTS.DIGITAL
  8. Position 8
    GSATEK Consultoría

    GSATEK Consultoría

    Lleida5.0 out of 57 Google reviews

    AutomationData & analyticsDocument search

    51.1/100

    View profile ↗ · GSATEK Consultoría
  9. Position 9
    elfactoria

    elfactoria

    Madrid5.0 out of 54 Google reviews

    Conversational AIAutomationDocument search

    50.5/100

    View profile ↗ · elfactoria
  10. Position 10
    IA GIRONA

    IA GIRONA

    Girona4.8 out of 511 Google reviews

    AutomationStrategy & trainingAI agents

    49.9/100

    View profile ↗ · IA GIRONA
  11. Position 11
    Instituto de Inteligencia Artificial

    Instituto de Inteligencia Artificial

    El Campello4.9 out of 590 Google reviews

    Strategy & trainingAI agentsDocument search

    48.7/100

    View profile ↗ · Instituto de Inteligencia Artificial
  12. Position 12
    App&Web

    App&Web

    Granada4.8 out of 513 Google reviews

    Document searchAI agentsConversational AI

    48.5/100

    View profile ↗ · App&Web
  13. Position 13
    MalditaIA

    MalditaIA

    Palma4.3 out of 56 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsConversational AI

    48.3/100

    View profile ↗ · MalditaIA
  14. Position 14
    AI Valencia

    AI Valencia

    Valencia5.0 out of 55 Google reviews

    AI agentsAutomationConversational AI

    47.7/100

    View profile ↗ · AI Valencia
  15. Position 15
    GESIO

    GESIO

    Alicante4.8 out of 577 Google reviews

    AutomationData & analyticsDocument search

    45.3/100

    View profile ↗ · GESIO
  16. Position 16
    PotenzzIA

    PotenzzIA

    Paterna5.0 out of 513 Google reviews

    Conversational AIAI agentsAutomation

    45/100

    View profile ↗ · PotenzzIA
  17. Position 17
    IdeaIt

    IdeaIt

    Castellón de la Plana5.0 out of 51 Google reviews

    AutomationDocument searchConversational AI

    44.7/100

    View profile ↗ · IdeaIt
  18. Position 18
    Todoesdata

    Todoesdata

    Palma5.0 out of 51 Google reviews

    AI agentsDocument searchData & analytics

    44.7/100

    View profile ↗ · Todoesdata
  19. Position 19
    Veltas

    Veltas

    Badajoz5.0 out of 52 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsDocument search

    44/100

    View profile ↗ · Veltas
  20. Position 20
    L

    Landbot

    Barcelona4.3 out of 518 Google reviews

    Conversational AIAI agentsAutomation

    43.7/100

    View profile ↗ · Landbot
  21. Position 21
    Dynaptia

    Dynaptia

    Murcia5.0 out of 51 Google reviews

    AutomationDocument searchStrategy & training

    43.2/100

    View profile ↗ · Dynaptia
  22. Position 22
    Bismart

    Bismart

    Barcelona4.4 out of 529 Google reviews

    Data & analyticsAI agentsDocument search

    41.1/100

    View profile ↗ · Bismart
  23. Position 23
    SDAI

    SDAI

    Zaragoza5.0 out of 55 Google reviews

    Strategy & trainingAutomationAI agents

    40.2/100

    View profile ↗ · SDAI
  24. Position 24
    Digital Robots

    Digital Robots

    Alicante5.0 out of 514 Google reviews

    AutomationAI agentsDocument search

    40.1/100

    View profile ↗ · Digital Robots
  25. Position 25
    MS2S INNOVACIÓN

    MS2S INNOVACIÓN

    Granada5.0 out of 54 Google reviews

    AI agentsAutomationDocument search

    40/100

    View profile ↗ · MS2S INNOVACIÓN

Methodology

What it is. The expertuno Score is a 0–100 score, the same for every profile, that adds up five components with public weights: Google reputation (30 points), declared technology (15), complete profile (15), website and verification (15) and public proof (25). Google reviews account for 30 of the 100 points; the rest depends on the technology each profile declares, how complete and verifiable it is and the public proof of its work. The ranking is sorted by the total; ties go to the higher weighted Google rating and then to the profile with more reviews. Each row shows the total and its breakdown by component.

Google reputation (30 points). It starts from a weighted (Bayesian) average that balances rating and number of reviews: each profile gets 20 “virtual” reviews at the ranking's average rating (C = 4.78 out of 5), so with few reviews its rating stays close to that average and the more reviews it has, the more its own rating counts (with 20 reviews, half; with 180, 90%). Weighted rating = (v ÷ (v + 20)) × R + (20 ÷ (v + 20)) × C, where R is the profile's rating and v its number of reviews. That weighted rating earns up to 25 points on a linear scale from 4.0 (0 points) to 5.0 (25 points), and review volume adds up to 5 more points (5 with 200 reviews or more). Without a Google rating, this component is 0.

Declared technology (15 points). It comes from the technologies and specialties each profile declares: at least one large language model (LLM: OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Mistral, Meta Llama, Azure OpenAI…) earns 5 points; at least one automation or orchestration platform (n8n, Make, Zapier, Power Automate, LangChain…), 3; at least one data or cloud platform (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, Power BI…), 3; five or more declared technologies, 2; and three or more specialties, 2. Each technology is recognised by its exact name from closed lists that are the same for every profile. It measures what the profile declares; it does not audit how the technology is used in projects.

Complete profile (15 points). Spanish description of at least 300 characters (3 points), tagline (1.5), three or more specialties (2), three or more technologies (2), at least one sector (1.5), team size (1.5), founding year (1.5) and logo (2).

Website and verification (15 points). Website working at the directory’s last check (6 points), profile claimed by its owner (4) and a current identity verification (5).

Public proof (25 points). Case studies published on the profile: one earns 5 points, two earn 8 and three or more earn 12 (case studies are currently published from the profile with the Pro plan). Public evidence on the profile: each case study or publication earns 3 points (up to 9) and each certification, talk or open-source project earns 2 (up to 4). Only evidence marked as public counts.

Upcoming criteria. Under study: domain authority and press mentions; they will be added once we have a verifiable, public source.

Who is included. Published profiles the directory classifies as AI specialists (AI core: 506 of 790 published), excluding demo listings; adjacent providers —marketing, training or IT services that offer some AI— are listed in the directory but not ranked. There is no minimum number of reviews: of the 506 ranked profiles, 304 have Google reviews, 306 earn points for declared technology and 1 has public proof (case studies or evidence). This page shows the 58 that declare the “Document search” specialty.

Sponsorship. Sponsorship does not change any score or position. The “Sponsored” card sits outside the numbering and, if the sponsored profile also appears in the ranking, its row carries a “Sponsored” label. NextAI is a brand of the same publishing group as expertuno; it appears as an identified sponsor and is scored with the same public formula as everyone else.

How to improve a score. Claim your profile and complete it (description, tagline, specialties, sectors, team, founding year and logo); declare the technologies you work with (language models, automation, data and cloud); keep your website working and verify your identity; publish case studies and public evidence (case studies, publications, certifications, talks or open source); and ask your clients to rate you on Google. Scores are recalculated with every data update. Claim my profile ↗Plans for professionals ↗

Sources and date. Rating and number of reviews: each provider's public Google Maps listing (expertuno does not publish reviews of its own). Technologies, profile, website, verification, case studies and evidence: expertuno directory data, as declared or published by each profile. Data as of 2 November 2026.

Limits. The score measures public reputation, declared technology and how complete and verifiable each profile is, not the technical quality of each project. Check each profile’s specialties, evidence and verification before deciding.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best agency for AI document search (RAG) in Spain?

According to the expertuno Score, the top position among profiles that declare AI document search (RAG) goes to NextAI (Valencia), with 73.4 points out of 100 (5.0 out of 5 on Google from 6 reviews), followed by INTERCONECTA and Bolher Consulting. The best option for your project also depends on scope, budget and location.

What are the best agencies for AI document search (RAG) in Madrid?

Among the Madrid profiles in the ranking, the best placed by expertuno Score are elfactoria (50.5 points), Profile Software Services (39.9 points) and Web2Web Innovation (39.5 points). The Madrid page lists every agency in the city, with a map. AI agencies in Madrid ↗

What is the expertuno Score?

It is the 0–100 score expertuno uses to sort this ranking, the same for every profile: Google reputation (30 points), declared technology (15), complete profile (15), website and verification (15) and public proof (25). It is calculated from public, verifiable data —Google Maps ratings, the technologies and details each profile declares and its public case studies and evidence— and the full methodology, including the formula, is on this page. Any profile can move up by claiming and completing its listing, declaring its technology stack, publishing case studies and evidence and earning Google reviews.

How is this ranking calculated?

The 506 published profiles the directory classifies as AI specialists are included, with or without reviews; adjacent providers are not ranked. Each one earns up to 30 points for Google reputation (a Bayesian average, Weighted rating = (v ÷ (v + 20)) × R + (20 ÷ (v + 20)) × C, with C = 4.78: from 4.0 to 5.0 it earns up to 25 points and review volume up to 5), 15 for declared technology (at least one language model 5, automation 3, data or cloud 3, five or more technologies 2 and three or more specialties 2), 15 for a complete profile, 15 for website and verification and 25 for public proof (case studies, up to 12, and public evidence, up to 13). Profiles are sorted by the total; ties go to the higher weighted Google rating and then to more reviews.

Can an agency pay to move up the ranking?

No. No position can be bought: sponsorship only buys the card labelled “Sponsored”, outside the numbering, and it adds no points and does not change the order. Every profile is scored with the same public formula; moving up means improving the data: claiming and completing the profile, declaring its technologies, verifying it, publishing case studies (currently with the Pro plan) and public evidence, and earning Google reviews.

Where can I see reviews and ratings of AI agencies?

Each expertuno profile shows the provider's Google Maps rating and number of reviews, together with its specialties, evidence and identity verification; 448 of the 790 published profiles show a rating. The full reviews are on each provider's public Google Maps listing: expertuno does not publish reviews of its own.

How much does it cost to hire an AI agency?

It depends on scope: a one-off assessment or training costs far less than building and integrating a custom agent or model, and rates vary between independent professionals and consultancies. The most useful step is to ask two or three profiles from the ranking for a quote on the same brief and compare scope, timing and support. AI pricing guide for businesses ↗